Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

Activity Theory can offer insights into learning processes that are facilitated by Learning Management Systems. Contradictions, as a basic principle of Activity Theory, assist in identifying the tensions and conflicts that emerge in systems of online learning environments. Using Activity Theory as its research framework, this study focuses on the contradictions that emerged in the form of tensions, frustrations, misunderstandings and miscommunication in a fully online university course in New Zealand. The data collection methods of this case study included individual interviews, online activity observation and documents analysis. Outlining some of the findings of the study, this paper will discuss how students’ participation in learning activities facilitated by Moodle was affected by these contradictions.

Keywords :

: Moodle; contradictions; Activity Theory; Learning Management Systems

References :

  1. H. Coates, J. Richard, and G. Baldwin, “A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning,” Tertiary Education Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 19-36, 2005.
  2. W. R. Watson, and S. L. Watson, “An argument for clarity: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become?,” TechTrends, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 28-34, 2007.
  3. C. Beer, K. Clark, and D. Jones, “Indicators of engagement,” In Curriculum, Technology and Transformation for an unknown future, C. H. Steel, M.J. Keppel, P. Gerbic and S. Housego, Eds., Sydney: Proceedings ascilite Sydney, 2010, 75-86.
  4. Y. Engeström, “Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research,” Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
  5. V. Kaptelinin, and B. A. Nardi, “Acting with Technology,” Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006.
  6. Y. Engeström, “Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical conceptualization,” Journal of Education and Work, vol. 14, pp. 133-156, 2001.
  7. V. Kaptelinin, B. A. Nardi, and C. Macaulay, “The activity checklist: A tool for representing the "space" of context,” Interactions, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 27-39, 1999.
  8. V. Kaptelinin, “Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction,” Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and human-computer interaction, B. A. Nardi, Ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996, pp. 103-116.
  9. K. Kuutti, “Activity theory as a potential framework for human computer interaction research,” Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction, B. A. Nardi, Ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996, pp. 17-44.

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.