Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

E-learning is becoming increasingly popular in many countries for its flexibility in terms of time, place and pace. Research affirms that learning technologies support interaction and collaboration among learners and improve learning outcomes. However, current practices of e-learning are not without constraints and there is a need for empirical research to assist practitioners in determining the best uses of learning technologies. This paper seeks to develop an understanding of students’ experiences and their perspectives of learning with the educational technologies of ‘Adobe virtual classroom’ and ‘Moodle’ that facilitated activities in a university course. The study was conducted using a case study method over a period of one semester. With Activity Theory as its research framework, the research methods of this study include individual interviews, online observation and document analysis. This paper includes some of the initial findings of the research and a brief discussion on how the educational technologies facilitated students’ engagement in this course. This may inform practitioners of the pragmatic constraints and affordances of existing technologies, learning activities and strategies used in online learning environments.

Keywords :

: Learning technologie; engagement; e-learning; affordances; constraints; Activity Theory

References :

  1. B. C. Lee, J. Yoon, and I. Lee, “Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results,” Computers and Education vol. 53, pp. 1320-1329, 2009.
  2. B. Holmes and J. Gardner, E-learning: concepts and practice, United Kingdom: SAGE, 2006.
  3. E-learning Advisory Group, Highways and pathways: Exploring New Zealand's e-learning opportunities, Wellington: Ministry of Education, 2002.
  4. K. Kuutti, “Activity theory as a potential framework for human computer interaction research,” In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human computer interaction, B. Nardi, Ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995, pp. 17-44.
  5. L. C. Yamagata-Lynch, “Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments,” New York: Springer, 2010.
  6. M. S. Desai, J. Hart, and T. C. Richards, “E-learning: paradigm shift in education,” Education, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 327-334, 2008.
  7. New Zealand Council for Education Research, Statistical profile of Maori in tertiary level education and engagement in e-learning, Wellington: New Zealand, 2004.
  8. V. Kaptelinin, B. Nardi, and C. Macaulay, “The activity checklist: A tool for representing the space of context,” Interactions, vol.6, no. 4, pp. 27-39, 1999.
  9. V. Kaptelinin,. “Activity theory: Implications for human-computer interaction,” Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and human-computer interaction, B. Nardi, Ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1996, pp. 103-116.
  10. Y. Engeström, “Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research,” Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.