Untitled Document
You are from : ( )  
Untitled Document
Untitled Document

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

 In review of e-learning literature, we found plenty of studies focus on motivation of e-learners but few studies examined the factors negatively influence on learners’ attitude and behaviors. To respond this need,  this study proposes three-component anxiety, namely trait anxiety, social anxiety and computer anxiety to examine their effects on learners’ attitude and their learning behaviors. Our findings show that three-component anxiety has significantly direct effect on attitude toward e-learning communities and indirect effect on learning behaviors. The moderating effect of gender is also examined, the findings show computer anxiety is the strongest factor in male group and social anxiety is the strongest factor in female group. Implications are proposed in the final section..

Keywords :

: CMC anxiety; Trait anxiety; Social anxiety; Computer anxiety; Online learning; elearning community

References :

  1. Adler, P.S. and Kwon, S. W.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 140 (2002)
  2. Archer, R. P.: Relationships between locus of control, trait anxiety, and state anxiety: An interactionist perspective,  Journal of Personality, 47(2), 305-316 (1979)
  3. Beckers, J. J. et al.: Computer Anxiety: ‘Trait’or ‘State’? Computer in Human Behavior, 23, 2851–2862, (2007)
  4. Brosnan, M. J.: The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(1), 63–78 (1998)
  5. Brown, S. A., Fuller, R. M., & Vician, C.: Who's afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer mediated communication, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5 (2), 79-107(2004)
  6. Chiu, C-M., Hsu, M-H., and Wang, E.T.G.: Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories, Decision Support Systems (42) 2006, pp: 1872-1888 (2006).
  7. Chung, S.-K., and Long, C.-F.: A study of the revised state-trait anxiety inventory, Psychological Testing, Vol. XXXI, p.27-36 (1984)
  8. Compeau, D., and Higgins, C.A.: Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,MIS Quarterly. 19:2, 189-211 (1995)
  9. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors, Journal of Marketing Research (18:1),39-50.( 1981)
  10. Hagel, J. and Armstrong, A.: Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities, Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press (1997)
  11. Huang, Echo, and Yen, Y.R.: Explore different group behaviors in virtual communities: from relationship perspective, Journal of Information Management, Special Issues, Vol. 16, pp.57-82. (2009)
  12. Huang, Echo, Hsu, M-H., Yen, Y.R.: Understanding participant loyalty intentions in virtual communities, ” WSEAS Transactions on Information Science & Applications, 4(5), 497-511 (2008)
  13. Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P.: A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12): 81-86. (1997)
  14. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & Mcguire, T. W.: Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication American Psychology, 39(10), 1122-1134 (1984)
  15. Leary, M.: Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement, Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(1), 66-75. (1983)
  16. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H.: The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasiexperiment,  Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136 (1999)
  17. Pierce, T.: Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, pp.1367-1372 (2009).
  18. Preece, J.: Online Communities. Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability, Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons (2000)
  19. Rapee, R. M., and Abbott, M. J.: "Mental representation of observable attributes in people with social phobia," Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37(2), 113-126 (2006)
  20. Reid, E.: The self and the Internet: Variations on the illusion of one self, In J. Gackenbach (Eds.), Psychology and the internet: intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications (pp. 29-42). California: Academic Press. (1998)
  21. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., and Arinze B.: Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.18, pp.329-354 (2006)
  22. Schlenker, B. R., and Leary, M. R.,: Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization and a model, Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669 (1982)
  23. Spielberger,C. D.: Anxiety as an emotional state," In C.D.Spielberger(Ed.),Anxiety:Current trends in theory and research (Vol.2)NewYork:Academic Press. (1972)
  24. Thatcher, J. B., & Pamela L.,: An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-efficacy," MIS Quarterly Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 381-396. (2002)
  25. Wang, Y., Q. Yu, and D.R. Fesenmaier.: Defining the virtual tourist community: implications for tourism marketing, Tourism Management, 23:4, 407-417( 2002)
  26. Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. (1998)
  27. Yen, Y.R., Huang, Echo, Sun, S-Y.: Intellectual capital’s impact on participants’ reshare knowledge intention in virtual communities, The 6th WSEAS International Conference on E-Activities, Spain, pp.26-31.(2007)

Untitled Document
Untitled Document
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.