Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

A majority of the student population studying English as their major were demonstrating a low proficiency for learning English. This study was initiated to determine if a reciprocal approach could be successfully adapted to an EFL reading classroom. One class, consisting of thirty-one first year English major students at Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, was chosen to be the subjects of this study. The teaching method used focused on face-to-face instruction supported with multiple online learning tools. Learning Management System (LMS) along with social media were used to complement classroom instruction. The strategies that were investigated in the EFL classroom were identifying the main idea, asking questions, clarifying, and predicting. A pre-test and post-test focused on English reading proficiency were the instruments used to conduct the study. In the classroom the students were trained using Blended eLearning lesson plans. In-depth data was gathered from the students using a semi-structured interview. The interviews with the subjects revealed that the reciprocal approach contributed to the positive development of their English reading comprehension skills. The results showed that the methods used in the study provided the students with many techniques to help them improve their understanding of what they read. They now know better how to look for the main idea, clarify the meaning of the text, be able to formulate questions regarding the content, and predict what will occur next. The training provided the students with effective tools to help them understand what they have read in English .

Keywords :

: reciprocal approach, reading skill, blended eLearning, Learning Management System (LMS)

References :

  1. Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objective. New York: Longman.
  2. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). THE HANDBOOK OF BLENDED LEARNING: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA. Pfeiffer Press.
  3. Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp.393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  4. Clark, R.C. (2008). E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Pfeiffer, Ltd. USA.
  5. Suppasetseree, S. & Dennis, N. K. (2010). The Use of Moodle for Teaching and Learning English at Tertiary Level in Thailand. The International Journal of Humanities. Illinois: Common Ground Publishing LLC, USA.
  6. Cole, J. (2005). Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. O’REILLY Community Press.
  7. Sands, P. (2002). Inside outside, upside downside: Strategies for connecting online and face-to-face instruction in hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved December 4, 2008 from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/sands2.htm.
  8. Sharma, P., & Berrett, B. (2007 Blended Learning: Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom. Macmillan Publishers.
  9. Somprasong, N. (2005) Development of Software Media in Promoting e-Learning According to Foreign Language Learning Standard Grade Range 2. Kasetsat University.
  10. Waterhouse, S. (2005). The Power of E-learning: The Essential Guide for Teaching in the Digital Age.
    Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.