Untitled Document
You are from : ( )  
Untitled Document
Untitled Document

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

The growth and development of technology in the current world has influenced considerable changes. Today, technology has transformed more than a few institutions by improving their performance. This research paper provides contextual information about electronic government (e-government). As a result of e-government, Information and Communication Technology has become one of the major significant factors in Thai Government. There are more than a few factors that influence ICT and there have been models developed to assist understanding of the relevant factors this is a preliminary paper which review the development of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology (UTAUT) model for understanding the critical factors influencing the adoption of ICT. The paper will also review the advantages and shortcomings of this model.

Keywords :

: e-government; Information and Communication Technology; adoption models .

References :

  1. Al, H. O., Aloudat, A., & Altarawneh, I. (April 01, 2013). Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of EGovernment in Developing Countries: The Case of Jordan. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (ijthi), 9, 2, 1-19.
  2. Al-Hakim, L. (2007). Global e-government: Theory, applications and benchmarking. Hershey [u.a.: Idea Group Publ.
  3. Carter, L. and Belanger, F. (2004). Citizen Adoption of Electronic Government Initiatives.In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04), IEEE publications Computer Society Digital Library.
  4. Cetron, J. F. (2007). Wireless acceptance in a university setting using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.
  5. Dada, D. (2006). The failure of E-Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26, 7, 1-10
  6. Dimitrova, D., & Chen, Y.-C. (January 01, 2006). Profiling the Adopters of EGovernment Information and Services. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 2, 172-188.
  7. Gascó, H. M. (2012). Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment: Institute of Public Governance and Management ESADE Barcelona Campus Sant Cugat, Barcelona, Spain, 14-15 June, 2012.
  8. Grèonlund, A., & ebrary, Inc. (2002). Electronic government: Design, applications and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  9. Heeks, R. (2003). Most E-government-For-Development projects Fail: How can Risks be reduced? Igovernment working paper series, paper no (14)
  10. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, Cal. [u.a.: Sage Publ.
  11. International Conference on e-Learning, & #The #Federico Santa María Technical University. (2014). Proceedings of the the 9th International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL-2014, 26-27 June 2014. Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
  12. Jaeger, P. and Matteson, M. (2009).e-Government and Technology Acceptance: The Case of the Implementation of Section 508 Guidelines for Websites, Electronic Journal of eGovernment Volume 7 Issue 1 2009, pp. 87 – 98.
  13. Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Lazer, D. (2007). From e-government to i-government: Governance and information technology in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  14. Prins, C. (2001). Designing e-government: On the crossroads of technological innovation and institutional change. The Hague [u.a.: Kluwer Law Internat.
  15. Rogers, E. M. (1966). Elementos de cambio social: difusión de innovaciones. Bogotá: Coedición de Ediciones Tercer Mundo y Facultad de Sociología (Sección de Investigación Social) Universidad Nacional.
  16. Schedler, K., Summermatter, L., & Schmidt, B. (2004). Managing the electronic government: From vision to practice. London: Information Age Publishing.
  17. Thompson, R., Compeau, D., & Higgins, C. (July 01, 2006). Intentions to Use Information Technologies: An Integrative Model. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18, 3, 25-46.
  18. Venkatesh, B. (2003). Data interpretation in critical care medicine. Philadelphia?: Butterworth Heinemann.
  19. Wimmer, M. A., & International Conference on Electronic Government, EGOV. (2009). Electronic government: 8th international conference, EGOV 2009, Linz, Austria, August 31 - September 3, 2009 :
    proceedings. Berlin [etc.: Springer.
  20. Woodside, A. G., & Kozak, M. (2014). Tourists' behaviors and evaluations. Bingley, U.K: Emerald.

Untitled Document
Untitled Document
  Copyright © 2014  IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.