Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

 Higher education institutions in many countries around the world are facing serious challenges from expansion, leading to a number of developments in the process of integrating information and communication technologies into university practices. In recent years, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) has witnessed an unprecedented growth in higher education and e-learning.
In addition, faculty members at many higher education institutions in the KSA are facing a number of obstacles in regards to the implementation of e-learning in their teaching. Hence, this paper will investigate some of the obstacles faced by some of the country’s universities in different locations across the country. A quantitative data approach was used with the analysis of 375 questionnaires. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were checked and statistical treatments such as percentages, means, frequencies, standard deviation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. The results from the quantitative data analysis identified several obstacles facing faculty members in terms of the implementation of e-learning in their teaching at some of the institutions. This paper describes how most obstacles identified by faculty members were regarded as being at university level and involved, for example, the absence of an institutional policy for e-learning. In addition, a number of other obstacles were identified, including: lack of integration of technical support, lack of support in instructional design for e-learning and lack of adequate training in the use of e-learning techniques. .

Keywords :

: Obstacles, E-learning, faculty members and Saudi Arabia.

References :

  1. Hussein, H.B., Hussein, Hisham Barakat. "Attitudes of Saudi Universities Faculty Members towards Using Learning Management System (JUSUR)." Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 10.2 (2011).‏. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2011. 10 (2).
  2.   Liaw, S.-S., H.-M. Huang, and G.-D. Chen, Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 2007. 49(4): p. 1066-1080.
  3. Gharaibeh, N.K., The Impact of Teaching Two Courses ( Electronic Curriculum Design and Multimedia ) on The Acquistion of Electronic Content Design Skills. The International journal of Multimedia & Its Applications, 2012. 4(6): p. 45-52.
  4.    Siritongthaworn, S., et al., The study of e-learning technology implementation: A preliminary investigation of universities in Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 2006. 11(2): p. 137-160.
  5.   Liaw, S.-S., Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 2008. 51(2): p. 864-873.
  6.   Blin, F. and M. Munro, Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 2008. 50(2): p. 475-490.
  7.   Iris, R. and A. Vikas, E-Learning technologies: A key to Dynamic Capabilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011. 27(5): p. 1868-1874.
  8. MCIT, The National Communications and Information Technology (NCIT) Plan, viewed 10 September, 2009,. viewed 10 September, 2009,, 2006.
  9. MOCIT, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, National Plan for Information Communication Technology, Riyadh:. MOCIT Press 2009.
  10. NCeL, (National Centre for e-Learning and Distance Learning, 2014). ( NCeL, 2014). 2014.
  11. Rogers, P.L., Barriers to Adopting Emerging Technologies in Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2000. 22(4): p. 445-472.
  12. Muir-Herzig, R.G., Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 2004. 42(2): p. 111-131.
  13. Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. , "Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration", . "Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration", , 2001. 18: p. pp26-30.
  14. Scrimshaw, P., Enabling teachers to make successful use of ICT. 2004.
  15. Pelgrum, W.J., Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 2001: p. 163–178.
  16. Jones, A., "A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptak of ICT by teachers," Coventry: Becta,. 2004.
  17. Gülbahar, Y. and I. Güven, A Survey on ICT Usage and the Perceptions of Social Studies Teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 2008. 11(3): p. 37-51.
  18. Morris, D., Are teachers technophobes? Investigating professional competency in the use of ICT to support teaching and learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010. 2(2): p. 4010-4015.
  19. Yalcin, S.A., et al., The Usage of Instructional Technologies by Lecturers (Examples of Erzincan). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011. 28: p. 435-438.
  20. Wilson, N.M., S Questionnaire Design: A Practical Introduction. Newton Abbey, Co. Antrim: University of Ulster Press., 1994.
  21. Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education 2011, Routledge. London & New York.
  22. Clough, P. and C. Nutbrown, A student's guide to methodology. 2002: Sage.
  23. Gay, L.R., Mills, Geoffrey. E., & Airasian, P. , Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill. , 2008.
  24. Creswell, J.W., Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall., 2008.

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2014  IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.