Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

E-learning has become a well incorporated mode of gaining knowledge in majority of the universities in the world. Most of the faculties are encouraging the use of electronic learning by students, a program which students have received with great acceptance. However, the implementation of e-learning in the universities requires support from the administration so as to enable it obtain full potential. As it will be indicated by this research, a large number of universities have been able to implement the program without any hardships, while others are  still facing challenges in the process. This is to show that e-learning will take a little more time to be fully adopted and hence, reach its expected potential. According to the outcome of the research, the new technology-supported mode of learning is still at the infant stage in many of the universities; as a result the study provides a number of reasons and offers them strategies to develop and achieve e-learning.

Keywords :

: e-learning; strategy; support; process; university

References :

  1. Andersson, S. B. (2006). Newly qualified teachers' learning related to their use of information and communication technology: a Swedish perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology 37 (5):665-682.
  2. Byron, I. & Gagliardi. R. (2002). Communities and the Information Society: Role of information and Communication Technology in education. Retrieved May 26, 2012, fromhttp://web.idrc.ca/en/ev-11118-201-1-Do_Topic.html
  3. Bates, A.W. (2000). Managing Technological Change. Strategies for College and University Leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Carry, D. and Willis, J. (2001). Technology and Teacher Education. Association of Advancement  of Computing in Education. Charlottesville, Va.
  5. Garrison, D. and Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century. Journal of language Teaching and Research, Vol. 3, No. 3.
  6. Jamlan, M. (2002). Distance Learning Between Current Practice and Future Perspectives. Journal of Educational and Psychological Sciences, 3(1), 138 – 162.
  7. Kleiman, G. (2000). Myths and Realities About technology in K-12 Schools. LNT Perspectives. The Online Journal of the Leadership and the New Technologies Community. Retrieved May 26, 2012 from: http://www.edc.org/LNT/NewsIssue14/feature1.htm
  8. Moser, F. Z. (2007). Faculty Adoption of Educational Technology. EQ Educause Quarterly, Retrieved May 26, 2012, from   http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolu m/FacultyAdoptionofEducationalTe/157436
  9. Murray, R. (2003). Information portals: casting a new light on learning for universities. Campus- Wide Information Systems, 20(4), 146-151.
  10. Neil, T. (2004). Guiding principals for staff and student support (Unpublished document.) Pirani, J. A. (2003). Supporting E-learning at the University of Phoenix. Educause Centre for Applied Research, Case Study.
  11. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education 49 (2):396-413.
  12. Spender, D. (2001). e-Learning: are Universities Prepared? In Online Learning in a Borderless Market. Conference proceedings at a conference held at Griffiths University Gold CoastCampus (p. 59-63). Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
  13. Steeples, C. & Zenois, M. (2004). Organizational patterns for E-learning Centers. Softic, S. K. & Bekic, Z. (2008). Organizational Aspect of Supporting E-learning at UniversityLevel. University of Zagreb, University Computing Centre.

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.