International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )
Nowadays in most of the educational systems all over the world many curriculum designers as well as administrators in the ministry of education of different countries recommended a very well-known approach of language teaching and learning namely Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the English classes. In such a circumstance that CLT has been widely adopted by textbook designers and material writers all over the world, especially in ESL countries, different researches which have been conducted in the ESL/EFL countries shows that still in many cases teachers and students have different challenges and problems in order to apply CLT in their schools. It goes without saying that an important prerequisite for applying this approach is computer and online services. By using computer and online materials teachers can improve different skills and sub-skills of their students through the improvement of communicative competence.In this study researchers attempted to investigate how CLT understood and implemented through computer usage in Malaysian secondary schools through the technology and computer usage from the students’ point of view.In order to gets a clear picture of students’ understanding perceptions and the way that they incorporate CLT through computer in the secondary schools. A semi-structured interview was conducted among 30 ESL Malaysian students in Malaysian secondary schools. Results of the study showed different contextual problems regarding implementation of CLT by using computers from the students’ viewpoint. There were some problems for applying CLT in Malaysian secondary schools English classes regarding facilities and textbooks. At the end of the study some pedagogical implications have been proposed by the researchers which can help decision makers in the language teaching and learning of this country.
: Communicative language teaching, compterized CLT,technology,English ESL learners, English language teaching & learning
- Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
- Brumfit, C.J. (1985). Langgge and Literature teaching From practice toprinciple. Oxford Pergamon Press.
- Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
- Dam, P. (2001). Hindsight of an English language learner. Paper presented at the Annual
- Meeting of the Texas Education Agency’s 64thAnnual Conference for Diverse Learners
- in Secondary Schools. Texas Austin.
- Hymes, D. (1971). Competence and performance in linguistic theory.In R. Huxley & E.
- Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods (pp. 3-28). London:Academic Press.
- Karavas-Doukas, E. (1996). Using attitude scales to investigate teachers’ attitudes to the
- communicative approach. ELT Journal, 50, 187-198.
- Littlewood, W. T. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Prabhu, N. S. (1990). There is no best method-Why? TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161-176.
- Rao, Z. (1996). Reconciling communicative approaches to the teaching of English with traditional Chinese methods.Research in the Teaching of English, 30(4), 458-471.
- Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Wilkins, D.A. (1972). Linguistics and Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.
- Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional Syllabus. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Xiao-xia, Q. (2006). Form-focused instruction in a communicative language classroom.Sino-US English Teaching, 3(12), 21-27.
- Yoon, K. (2004). CLT theories and practices in EFL curricula: A case study of Korea[Electronic version]. Asian EFL Journal, 6(3).1-16.