Untitled Document
   
You are from : ( )  
     
Untitled Document
Untitled Document
 

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

This paper presents a preliminary study on the learning styles preference of the mechanical engineering students in Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN). The Honey and Mumford Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) was distributed to the engineering students with the sample of (n=104) as the instrument to assess the students preferred learning styles. The findings of this study showed that the most dominant learning style(s) for engineering students is activist (very strong preference), followed by Theorist and Reflector (strong preference), Pragmatist (average preference). Therefore, it is important for engineering educators to be aware of the students preferred learning styles in the efforts of facilitating students learning potential through various teaching and learning approaches and suggest the use of smart information and communication technology (ICT) tools to be used in their learning.

Keywords :

: learning styles; engineering education; ICT; educational technology

References :

  1. Prados, John W. "Action agenda for systemic engineering education reform: next steps." Proceedings of the 1998 Engineering Foundation Conference. 1998.
  2. Augustine, Norman R. "Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future." Retrieved March 19 (2005): 2008.
  3. D. Wince-smith, “Innovate America: Thriving in a world of challenge and change,” in Global Innovation Ecosystem 2007 Symposium, 2005.
  4. National Science Board, “Moving forward to improve engineering education (NSB-07-122),” 2007.
  5. Keefe, James W. Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. National Association of Secondary School Principals,1991.
  6. Felder, Richard M. "Matters of style." ASEE prism 6.4 (1996): 18-23.
  7. Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. "Understanding student differences."Journal of engineering education 94.1 (2005): 57-72.
  8. Cassidy, Simon. "Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures." Educational Psychology 24.4 (2004): 419-444.
  9. Coffield, Frank, et al. Should we be using learning styles?: What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre, 2004.
  10. Jegatha Deborah, L., R. Baskaran, and A. Kannan. "Learning styles assessment and theoretical origin in an E-learning scenario: a survey." Artificial Intelligence Review (2012): 1-19.
  11. S. Manjit Sidhu, “Development and applications of interactive multimedia TAPS (Technology Assisted Problem Solving) packages for engineering,” University Malaya, Malaysia, 2006.
  12. Ogot, Madara, and Gul E. Okudan. "Systematic creativity methods in engineering education: a learning styles perspective." International Journal of Engineering Education 22.3 (2007): 566.
  13. Lawrence, Gordon. "People Types and Tiger Stripes: A Practical Guide to Learning Styles, Gainesville, Fla." Center for applications of psychological type (1993).
  14. Tendy, Susan M., and William F. Geiser. "The search for style: It all depends on where you look." (1997). National FORUM of Teacher Education Journal 9.1 (1997): 3-15.
  15. Stice, James E. "Using Kolb's Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning."Engineering education 77.5 (1987): 291-96.
  16. Kolb, David A. "Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development." (1984).
  17. Montgomery, Susan M., and Linda N. Groat. "Student learning styles and their implications for teaching." CRLT Occasional Papers 10 (1998): 1-8.
  18. Felder, Richard M., and Linda K. Silverman. "Learning and teaching styles in engineering education." Engineering education 78.7 (1988): 674-681.
  19. Felder, Richard M. "Reaching the second tier." Journal of College Science Teaching 23.5 (1993): 286-290.
  20. Honey, Peter, and Alan Mumford. The learning styles helper's guide. Peter Honey Learning, 2000.
  21. Armstrong, Victoria, et al. "Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology."Educational Review 57.4 (2005): 457-469.
  22. Jackson, Chris J. "Predicting team performance from a learning process model." Journal of Managerial Psychology 17.1 (2002): 6-13.
  23. Honey, Peter, and Alan Mumford. Using your learning styles. 2nd ed. Maidenhead,, UK: Peter Honey, 1986.
  24. Lowery, Caroline. "Adapting to student learning styles in a first year electrical/electronic engineering degree module." Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre 4.1 (2008): 52-60.
  25. Honey, Peter, and Alan Mumford. The Manual of Learning Styles. 3rd ed. Maidenhead,, UK: Peter Honey, 1992.
  26. Lowenthal, Patrick R., and Joanna C. Dunlap. "From pixel on a screen to real person in your students' lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling." The Internet and Higher Education 13.1 (2010): 70-72.
  27. Duderstadt, James J. "Engineering for a Changing Road, A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education." (2009).

Untitled Document
     
Untitled Document
   
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.