Untitled Document
You are from : ( )  
Untitled Document
Untitled Document

International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science ( IJITCS )

Abstract :

The present study aimed to demonstrate how an instrumented vehicle, a bicycle, can objectively measure the motorized vehicle-related factors, road-related factors, and bicyclist-related factors to explore the concerned traffic safety issues, such as how the factors influenced motorists’ decisions about initial passing distances for a bicyclist. An urban-style bicycle was fitted with one global positioning system, one multi-function logger (including a 3-axis accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a compass), two ultrasonic distance sensors, eight proximity switches, one variable resistor, and five car camera DVR black boxes. There were thirty-four participants using the instrumented vehicle in real traffic. The study clearly demonstrated how the factors influenced the motorists’ initial left-side passing distance, including the motorized vehicles, road-related factors, and bicyclist-related factors. The present study demonstrated that an instrumented vehicle is capable of collecting rich data concerning users’ behaviors, which could potentially be utilized in various types of studies. However, this method requires a large sample and considerable time and effort for data processing.

Keywords :

: Instrumented bicycle, Behavior index, Naturalistic riding

References :

  1. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J., Perez, M.A., Hankey, J., Ramsey, D., Gupta, S., Bucher, C., Doerzaph, Z.R., Jermeland, J., Knipling, R.R., 2006. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment, DOT HS 810 593, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington D.C., US.
  2. Chaurand, N., Delhomme, P., 2012. Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: A comparison of perceived  crash risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.005.
  3. Atkins, 2005. Advanced Stop Line Variations Research Study, Job No. 503 1271, Findings Report, May 2005, Atkins, London, UK.
  4. Hunter, W.W., Thomas, L., Stutts, J.C., 2005. BIKESAFE: Bicycle Countermeasure Selection System, FHWA-SA-05-006, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. US.
  5. Heesch, K.C., Sahlqvist, S., Garrard, J., 2011. Cyclists’ experiences of harassment from motorists: Findings from a survey of cyclists in Queensland, Australia. Preventive Medicine, 53, 417-420.
  6. Eilert-Petersson, E., Schelp, L., 1997. An epidemiological study of bicycle-related injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29 (3), 363-372.
  7. Walker, I., 2007. Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39, 417-425.
  8. Parkin, J., Meyers, C., 2010. The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 159-165.
  9. Love, D.C., Breaud, A., Burns, S., Margulies, J., Romano, M., Lawrence, R., 2012. Is the three-foot bicycle passing law working in Baltimore, Maryland? Accident Analysis and Prevention, 48, 451- 456.
  10. Reynolds, C.C., Harris, M.A., Teschke, K., Cripton, P. A., Winters, M., 2009. The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature. Environmental Health, 8:47, doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-47. (access at 13 February 2012 http://www.ehjournal.net/content/8/1/47)
  11. Landis, B.W., Vattikuti, V.R., Brannick, M.T., 1997. Real-time human perceptions: Toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 119-126.
  12. Elvik, R., Bjørnskau, T., 2005. How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 1005-1011.

Untitled Document
Untitled Document
  Copyright © 2013 IJITCS.  All rights reserved. IISRC® is a registered trademark of IJITCS Properties.